Title: Super
Director: James GunnReleased: 2010
Starring: Rainn Wilson, Ellen Page, Liv Tyler, Kevin Bacon, Nathan Fillion, Michael Rooker
Plot: Frank (Wilson) is a downtrodden short-order cook,
whose wife Sarah (Tyler) has just left him for drug dealer Jacques (Bacon).
Sinking into a deep depression he suffers a vision were he is touched by the
hand of god, while being advised by the Holy Avenger (Fillion) a Christian public-access
TV show superhero to become his own superhero. Now transformed into Crimson
Bolt he sets out to clean up the city of crime.
Review: I think the announcement that Director James Gunn had
been chosen as the director of “Guardians of the Galaxy” as part of Marvel
Studios Phase two, I can safely say I was almost as surprised as when Peter
Jackson was announced as the director of “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy. The
main reason for this surprise was that both came from a horror background, with
Jackson especially notorious for the bad taste splatter of his early films,
before moving onto more mainstream but none the less dark fare like the
fantastic “Heavenly Creatures”. Gunn’s career path while perhaps not so dark as
Jackson’s is still one containing its own amount of splatter, having started
off working for Troma and making his directorial debut with the gooey “Sliver”
for which this film would be its follow up, while the rest of his career to
date has been very much horror influenced. So with this in mind I was curious
to see how this would shape his vision of a superhero movie, especially after
previously playing with the superhero genre with “The Specials”. Watching this
film though only really begs the question again as to what the Marvel exec’s
were thinking when they gave Gunn the “Guardians of the Galaxy” gig, especially
considering the pitch black vein of humour which runs throughout this film, as
Gunn gives us his truly unique take on costume vigilantes.
Bizarrely released at the same time of the more recognised
and lighter “Kick-Ass” aswell as the little seen “Defendor” in what seemed to
be a mini craze for the subject of costume vigilanties. Gunn here has chosen to
take a much more risqué route, seeing how Frank is far from the most instantly
likable character, having been so downtrodden for so long we first meet him at
essentially his lowest point, especially when he can only think of two happy moments
in his life. The first being the day he married Sarah and the other being when
he directed a police officer to catch a purse snatcher, both of which he immortalises
in childlike drawing and stuck on the otherwise bare walls of his apartment. Needless
to say this sort of character is the perfect fit for Wilson who has spent the
best part of his career playing such social outcasts, with Wilson’s performance
as Frank seemingly building on his role as Arthur on “Six Feet Under”.
Much like his costume vigilante contempories, Frank has no
super powers to speak off and after a failed attempt at busting a drug dealer,
soon controversially arms himself with a pipe wrench, which soon has him marked
on the police radar for all the wrong reasons, especially when his superhero
antics usually end up putting the criminals in the intensive care unit. Still
this doesn’t deter him, especially as he is so convinced of his mission,
seeming sent from god himself in a scene were he is not so much touched by god
but rather scalped and poked in the brain by god in a scene I can’t help but
feel was inspired by the Channard Cenobite from “Hellraiser 2”, in a scene
which only further marks out Gunn’s love of the horror genre.
While previous entries in the costume vigilant genre (if that’s
what this can be classed as?) have focused on the wannabe superhero and their journey
to being a true hero, “Super” instead seems to be about one man setting out on
the path of trying to make a difference, while slowly becoming more unhinged as
his journey progresses, here seen from the comical first attempts at busting
crime by lurking around empty alleyways through to him finally stocking up on
firepower and explosives for his suicidal final assault on Jacques stronghold.
Also unlike the other films Frank gets (if unwillingly) a sidekick in the form
of the hyperactive and foul mouthed comic book store clerk Libby, who starts
off first as his comic book guru, helping Frank find the identity of the Crimson
Bolt by studying comic book hero and soon joins Frank on patrol as his sidekick
Boltie. It’s an unusual approach and one which really sinks or swims depending
on if you get Gunn’s warped sense of humour. Still it is really a tribute to
the cast (all who worked to scale) who commit to their roles so fully that the
film works so well with Page especially unhinged and a far cry from her usual
roles, while Bacon once again shows his usual fearlessness as he harnesses his
inner sleazebag, to make Jacques a truly disgusting individual even to the
point where he disgusts even his own henchmen with his actions.
What was most surprising here though was the gore quota,
which is in many ways is unsurprising when you consider the amount of Pipe wrench
clubbing being dished out to drug dealers right through to people cutting in
line. So while cracked skulls are mainly the order of the day, while Gunn also
finds a number of opportunities to surprise the audience with these sporadic
moments of gore, which frequently come without warning and often creating a
double punch thanks to the already frequently out there nature of the material.
Needless to say like with the rest of the film Gunn is none the less creative
with his splatter with Frank’s visions / Brain poke certainly proving memorable,
much like the finale were deaths are shown in slow motion complete with crudely
drawn Batman esq pow bubbles.
Managing shock at the same time it amuses, Gunn walks a
tricky tightrope and one which won’t work for everyone. Still there is enough
originality here to make for an interesting trip at the least, especially as it
will no doubt leave you wondering what the hell you’ve just watched.
Okay, so I will be watching this one as soon as possible! Sounds like a comic book movie done in the dark comedy vein...I too wonder how Gunn ended up directing Guardians of the Galaxy, I mean Slither flopped hard...and Super wasn't a success...but then again there's those two Scooby Doo movies which made some moolah...it's either the success of the Scooby Doo movies or Gunn's got some good connections in Hollywood, friends in high places...
ReplyDeleteI guess this is once again a case of who you know, or could be just that the script he submitted as so good the let him direct. Still I'm going to be interested to see how he works Michael Rooker into "Guardians of The Galaxy", seeing how much he loves Rooker (and with good reason...when he's used right).
DeleteStill Guardians is hardly one of the big Marvel properties, while at the same time Marvel have made some intresting choices for directors if you look at who worked on Phase one, all were pretty much a gamble bar the exception of Wheldon, who unsurprisingly got the big movie...and then made enough money for the studio to cover the cost of the next phase :)