Adapted from the
indie comic series of the same name by Charles S. Forsman the series
follows 17 year old James (Alex Lawther) who believes he’s a
psychopath and fellow classmate Alyssa (Jessica Barden) who has her
own issues including a problematic home life which includes being
sexually harassed by her stepfather. Wanting to escape their problems
the pair set out on a spontaneous road trip / crime spree.
Switching between
it’s two leads who take turn to narrate the story its clear from
the start that both James and Alyssa are outsiders. James more
obviously as he keeps to himself while observing his fellow students
as he attempts to find the perfect victim to evolve his growing
psychotic tendances which thanks to some Wes Anderson style framing (which sadly isn't carried past the pilot episode)
we see has until now been restrained to various animals. Alyssa on
the other side of things feels that she can’t connect with anyone
around her as her so called friends want to talk to each other
through text messages even when they are sitting across from each
other. Equally with her explosive temper and general Don’t give a
shit attitude especially with her mother seemingly more focused on
living her life of domestic bliss to seemingly notice anything that’s
happening with her daughter.
Thrown together the
series initially is more focused on wether James will kill Alyssa or
not, especially as his every other thought early on seems to be
having fantasies of him killing her, but surprisingly its once the
series moves past this and focuses instead on these two lost souls
finding themselves through each other that the story really starts to
find it’s grove with the pair finding themselves soon on the run
from the law after a run in with an actual psychopath end messily.
Both Lawther and
Barden are great as the leads and really manage to make this unlikely
relationship work though the character of James does suffer from
being at times limited especially for the first half of the series
were he’s essentially limited to his psychotic fantasies and while
his character is more redeemed in the second half of the series
especially when we find out more about his troubled past. Alyssa
however remains a fun and feisty character throughout especially when
she’s seemingly unable to find any situation she can’t find
someone to fallout with or to subject to her wrath.
Outside of the pairs
Bonnie and Clyde antics, the show receives strong support from an
interesting mix of characters in particular Gemma Whelan and Wunmi
Mosaku as the detectives trying to track down James and Alyssa, while
dealing with their own relationship being strained by a misguided
advance but like everything in this series nothing should be taken on
first impressions and this is certainly the case here as well and to
watch them evolve over the course of the series only makes the world
more believable as characters are given ample time to be fleshed out
into multi-level characters rather than just being included to give a
sense of tension to James and Alyssa’s journey.
Certainly this is one of the
more unique series of last year it went largely unnoticed despite
receiving a strong advertising push. Recently though the series got
picked up by Netflix which is possibly the platform that it needs,
especially as this fast paced black comedy is still worth
discovering.
Starring: Suki
Waterhouse, Jason Momoa, Keanu Reeves, Jim Carrey, Yolonda Ross,
Giovanni Ribisi, Jayda Fink, Diego Luna, Cory Roberts, E.R. Ruiz
Plot: In the near
future criminals and other society rejects are dumped in a fenced off
area of desert wasteland outside of the Texas. The latest addition to
this community is Arlen (Waterhouse) who soon finds herself having to
traverse the landscape of scavengers, cannibals and cultists if she
is going to survive this dangerous and lawless world.
Review: Following on
from the critically adored “A Girl Walks Home Alone At Night”
director Ana Lily Amirpour chooses to follow it up here with this sun
soaked dose of dystopia while at the same time seemingly channelling the cinema
outlaws Harmony Korine and Greg Araki to craft a fiercly unique
vision which will likely prove too abstract for the mainstream movie
goer but there is unquestionably something here.
Bringing to mind
Richard Kelly’s fiercely diversive “Southland Tales” here
Amirpour clearly sets out with a vision for her sophomore effort,
though at the same time its one which will either enthral or bore you depending on your own opinion of the film
the former of which I certainly found myself in even if at times its
hard to actually know what is supposed to be happening other than a
whole lot of cannibalism and desert wandering and this of course
makes it the sort of film as a critic you kind of dread encountering.
I mean how are you supposed to write about nothing? Still as I sit
here writing this two days after I first watched it this is a film
which continues to run through my head so that I feel compelled to
get something down about it.
Opening to Arlen
being dumped into this world we are mere moments into the film before
she is set upon by one of the resident cannibals who quickly relieve
her of one of her arms and a leg before she sets out to escape across
the desert on a skateboard reminiscent in a scene reminiscent of the
opening of “There Will Be Blood” whose record of no dialogue for
the first 14.5 minutes this film smashes by none of the characters
actually talking till we are 30 mins in. Its also during this
sequence that we are introduced to the Hermit played throughout the
film in complete silence by Jim Carrey just one of a series of
interesting casting choices which also sees Keanu Reeves showing up
as the cult-like leader of the town Comfort known only as “The
Dream” who runs a sideline in pot with his harem of pregnant
ladies.
Across the desert
landscape we encounter a number of settlements which has sprung up
with Amirpour following in the footsteps of George Miller as the
residents have constructed shanty towns out of aeroplane parts and
broken down trailers, creating a new society for themselves and one
seemingly styled by the same costume department Harmony Korine uses
from Arlen’s winking booty shorts to Jason Momoa’s “Miami Man”
chest tattoo which serves like an alt-culture name tag, though why
she went with that name like so much of the film is a complete
mystery.
Arlen though is
quick to adapt to this world as the film skips forward six month once
she arrives in comfort to were has she gained a prosthetic leg and
spend her time wandering the wasteland which is were the main story
of sorts begins when she picks up the Miami Man’s daughter Honey
(Fink) after killing her cannibal mother. From here though its really
a lot of wandering as Miami Man tries to find his now missing
daughter before further wandering with Arlen when Honey gets picked
up by Keanu Reeve’s cult leader “The Dream” during an acid
infused rave sequence.
Miami Man on the
other hand is a slightly more complex character as Momoa spend the
film wandering around shirtless and looking like he was carved out of
wood, a cold warrior hardened by the enviroment around him, who feels
nothing about keeping a woman chained up in his yard to use for food,
inbetween painting detailed paintings of his daughter, though its a
connection more confirmed in the wikipedia plot summery than in the
film, were she comes across like a girl from his camp. He however
like the other characters is a fascinating to watch on screen with
Amirpour only giving us small hints of details about these characters
and leaving us as the audience to figure things out, which while
certainly a bold choice is also the kind of thing which put off
audience not wanting to sit through something so abstract.
Now if any of this
is sounding like a confusing mess then you probably would be right
and yet its a fascinating mess which Amirpour allows you to get lost
in using minimalistic dialogue and instead attention grabbing visuals
to tell her story if you can even really call it that. Instead what
it often feels like is more of a snapshot of these characters lives
as we follow them like ghosts in this world and much like with “Ghost
World” we are just along for the ride as events play out acting
more like the observers than actually being part of this world. Of
course if David Lynch can get away with telling a story on the latest
season of Twin Peaks over 18 episode when he really only needed four,
then why can't we enjoy a visually arresting and minimalist desert
romp? Yes this really isn’t going to be for everyone and already I
can see this film ending up like “Southland Tales” as its as
hated as its adored.
Director: Jon Favreau Released: 2014 Starring: Jon Favreau, Sofia Vergara,
Scarlett Johansson, Oliver Platt, Bobby Cannavale, Dustin Hoffman, Emjay
Anthony, Robert Downey Jr.
Plot: Carl (Favreau), a head chef bored
with churning out the same old classic dishes and wanting to innovate his cooking
soon finds himself fired after running afoul of the restaurant owner Riva
(Hoffman). Now heading back to Miami he hits upon the idea of running a food
truck, before heading off on a cross country road trip with his son Percy
(Anthony) and his best friend Martin (Leguizamo) in tow.
Review:
Here we have one of those rare films which like “The Darjeerling Limited” I
want to watch again as soon as it ended, but also one which I instantly knew
deserved a place on my essentials list.
Perhaps
it was due to the source material, having grown up in a family were for the
guys knowing how to cook was an essential life skill to be mastered, with my
father having originally trained to be a chef only to then decide that he didn’t
want to be one once he’d completed his training much to the dismay of my
grandfather, a legendry cook in my family in his own right. Needless to say
having grown up learning to cook with my father, it was inevitable that one of
the main storylines here which see’s Carl bonding with his son over cooking
which resonate with me.
A
film crafted out Favreau’s desire to work on a smaller scale project after
having spent the last few years working on big budget features, which lets not forget saw him as
the first director to kick off the Marvel cinematic universe by directing the
first two “Iron Man” films, it is nice to see Favreau returning to his
independent roots mirroring in many ways his character’s journey we follow in
the film.
Seemingly
drawing inspiration from chef / author Antony Bourdain, Carl is head chief who
loves his industry, a passion which makes him popular with his fellow chef’s,
though at the same time has been at the cost of his marriage and connection
with his son who he currently has an estranged relationship with.Interestingly it’s not his ego which
initially causes his downfall as you would expect, as he clashes with his boss
Riva (here played by Hoffman in a rare villainous turn) over the type of dishes
to serve when Carl calls out food critic Ramsey Michel (Platt) whose dismay at
the dishes being served leads Carl to a very public meltdown in one of the few
moments were he loses his cool and in this case his career.
It’s
this fall from glory and his journey back to the top, were the real heart of
the film lies as Carl returns to his hometown and buys himself a banged up food
truck, which he fixes up with his son and partner in crime Martin, here played
by Leguizamo with his usual vibrant energy. At the same time this new beginning
marks not only a new start for Carl’s career, but also a chance to reboot his relationship
with his son as they start to bond over cooking, with such great scenes as Carl
buying his son his first cook’s knife and explaining the responsibility that
comes with it, as well as disciplining him over wanting to serve a burned
sandwich highlighting a standard he refuses he maintains regardless of the
level he’s working at. At the same time Percy furthers their renewed connection
by handling the social media promotion for the truck, as he attempts to educate
Carl how to use Twitter which bizarrely is so heavily featured throughout I had
to wonder if they were sponsoring the film.
Unsurprisingly
for a film about cooking, there is some serious food-porn action happening
throughout the film as we get to see various dishes being created from high end
culinary dishes through to the equally tasty Cuban sandwiches which form the
foundation of his return to the top. The film also takes in real life restaurants
such as “Café du Monde” in New Orleans French quarter and “Franklin Barbecue”
in Austin, Texas which only add to the experience with Favreau citing “Jiro
Dreams of Sushi” amongst the films which inspired him and when it comes to how
food is presented and shot here, these inspirations are clear. At the same time Favreau embarked on a crash course in French culinary schooling aswell as training with food truck chef Roy Choi who also served as a consultant on the film and here Favreau's schooling pays off as he looks perfectly comfortable in the kitchen while it adds a level of realism to proceedings not usually seen in these kinds of films.
Favreau
here has assembled a great cast, while at the same time using his little black
book of celebrity contacts, as we get cameo’s not only by the aforementioned
Hoffman, but also by “Iron Man” alumni Scarlett Johansson and Robert Downey Jr.
who put in good performances for the brief but memorable appearances that they make here,
much like the underrated Oliver Platt who as food critic Ramsey Michel and
whose brother is actually a food critic, manages to have the audience view his
character one way when we first meet him, while managing to pull a reversal by
the time we meet him again at the end. Elsewhere Sofia Vergara appearing as
Carl’s ex-wife who he maintains a friendly relationship with, brings her usual Latin
charms while essentially playing the same role she always does, which isn’t a
bad thing, especially when she is always so fun when she is on the screen.
The
film could be criticised for its lack of high drama, as Favreau concentrates on
the fun of the journey and Percy discovering the joy of cooking, but when the
journey is packed with so many colourful characters and delicious sights and latin
fused soundtrack there is little longing for anything which might distract from
these things. If anything this is the
sort of film which makes you long for the days of scratch and sniff card or a
4D viewing especially when the film is shot in such an immersive style. Still
for now I can only hope that Favreau continues this interest in making low
budget, especially if this is any indication of the sort of films he would be
making as I’d certainly love to see him doing more films like this than another
big budget feature, especially if they are this tasty.
Director: Peter Sollett Released: 2008 Starring: Michael Cera, Kat
Dennings, Ari Graynor, Alexis Dziena, Aaron Yoo, Rafi Gavron, Jay Baruchel,
Jonathan B. Wright
Plot: Nick (Cera) the sole
straight member of the Queercore band “The Jerk Offs”, still pining for his
ex-girfriend Tris (Dziena), finds himself thrown together with fellow indie
music fan Norah as they embark on a quest to find a secret gig being held by
their favourite band “Where’s Fluffy?”.
Review: One of a spate of indie comedies which for one
reason or another managed to transcend themselves into the mainstream
conscious. Perhaps slightly less surprising for this film seeing how its based
around the love of indie music, let alone the fact it stars Michael Cera who at
the time was coming in hot off “Arrested Development” were he’d perfected his
now trademark softly spoken awkwardness and which he brings here as the
Heartbroken Nick, who spends his time obsessively making Breakup mixtapes
unaware that his ex is just tossing them in the trash. At the same time these
mixtapes are being collected by Norah who also dislikes Tris for her own
reasons yet can’t escape her due to them sharing a friend in Caroline
(Graynor).
While Cera might be playing his usual role, Kat Dennings on
the other hand as Norah here is essentially the polar opposite to the sort of
character we have become accustomed to seeing her playing, starting out quiet
and retiring and slowly over the course of the night her character morphs into
a more confident and essentially closer to the character we expect her to being
playing. Even though she’s not playing her usual confronting and sarcastic
style, she like Cera still makes for an engaging lead and doesn’t lose anything
by playing against type, even if it as times strange to see her frequently
acting so vulnerable in situations when you’d expect her to be tearing that
person down in any other role.
Taking in a twilight tour of New York’s indie hotspots as
the pair attempt to find the location of the secret gig, all the while having
to deal with obstacles such as their problem ex’s, Nick’s crazed bandmates and
a bunch of frenzied drag queens determined to celebrate Christmas all year
round. The film in many ways playing like a more mobile version of “Clerks”
with Nick’s yellow Yugo which constantly gets mistaken by drunken clubbers for
being a Taxi cab. However while the
setup might be about them getting together from the start, you really couldn’t
tell this was ever the plan seeing how the pair don’t spend the whole time
making cliché moves on each other or engaging in quasi cool conversations. Only
occasionally do we get a longing look or some indication that this pair could
be something more, infact it seems that Nick’s friends see the potential in
their relationship long before they do, with Norah getting a quick make over
from his friends even though she’s essentially just met them.
As a result of events not playing out as traditionally as
expected, we instead get akward moments of Nick and Norah facing their ex’s for
which they both seemingly hold some residual feels yet unsure how to proceed as
they both have feelings for each other while unsure how the other feels about
them, leaving them stranded in a relationship no man’s land. For Nick he has to
face Tris’s sudden increase of interest in him, due to the fact that she
believes that he has moved on with Norah, even attempting to seduce him via an
impromptus seductive dance to Hot Chocolate’s “You Sexy Thing”. A moment which
really only highlights just how different Tris and Nick are, especially going
off their musical tastes as also highlighted by how casually they disregards
the break up mixtapes he’s been obsessively making for her. Norah on the other
hand has to deal with her own ex / friend with benefits Tal (Baruchel) whose
interest is seemingly more grounded in getting his band demo tape to her record
producer father.
The other main obstacle standing in their way is the disappearing
act pulled by Caroline which serves mainly to enable some of the cities more
random nightlight spots to be showcased including a drag queen revue which
generally adds some colour to the film rather than just being a series of
identikit indie clubs. At the same time these club sequences ensure that the soundtrack
is kept packed with some cool sounds, even if I’d be pressed to
While this twilight journey through New York is largely a
fun one and both Dennings and Cera share some great on screen chemistry,
especially with Cera’s awkwardness really working with his character. It is
however let down by the wet fart of an ending which lacks and of the required
payoff you’d want, especially after the journey you have been through with
these characters, more so when they so casually write off the goal they have been
chasing, which it seems that director Sollett feels has more significance, but
here it mainly makes you wonder why they put so much importance on finding the
band in the first place.
A flawed yet still enjoyable indie romcom that hits
enough of the right notes to make it still a worthwhile watch, even if it doesn’t
really much in the way of surprises along the way.
Starring: George Clooney, Vera
Farmiga, Anna Kendrick, Jason Bateman, Amy Morton, J.K. Simmons, Sam Elliot,
Danny McBride, Zach Galifianakis
Plot: Ryan Bingham (Clooney) makes
his living traveling around the United States firing people when their
employers are unwilling to do it themselves. It’slife he is content living until his company
threaten to take it away with the introduction of videoconferencing, an idea he
is quick to oppose leading to him taking new hire and the instigator of this
new process Natalie (Kendrick) out with him in the field.
Review: Director Reitman first burst onto the scene with
“Thank You For Smoking” a film which followed a lobbyist for Tobacco actively trying
to encourage more people to smoke and here again he gives another character
with an usual job that they actually enjoy doing. So is the case with Ryan, who
enjoys his job so much that he sees it as a burden to have to go home on those
few days every year when he hasn’t got an assignment.
A creature of habit, Ryan has lived this life for so long he now has his routine down to almost
a science, even crafting his personal philosophies into motivational speeches
he gives at conferences under the heading of “What’s In Your Backpack?”, all
while working towards his target of reaching ten million frequent flyer miles
with American Airlines, a goal which he is set to be only the seventh person to
achieve. Of course he’s none too pleased to have this work cocoon being
threatened by what Natalie is trying to put in place, while his stubbornness to
change sees him embarking on a mission to prove her wrong as the pair embarks
on their highly unique road trip.
While Ryan might seem like a solitary character, especially
with his sparsely decorated apartment, which he seems to have set out to make
seem like any of the many hotel rooms he stays in, judging by the stolen hotel
towels and fridge full of mini bar spirit bottles. However he has a causal
relationship with Alex (Farmiga) a seeming kindred spirit and fellow frequent
flyers, with the two hooking up whenever their paths cross. But while it might
not be a traditional lifestyle it is one that Ryan is happy living. Clooney
really embraces this character, especially in how he handles his day to day
work which is not so much with the cold and calculating nature you’d expect him
to approach this task with, but rather he relies on a tried and tested quotes,
while seemingly knowing how to handle any reaction the people he’s firing.
As with “Thank you For Smoking” the journey the film takes
us on is once again one were we have a character of fixed motivation, who
slowly comes to realise that his world view might not be as true as they
thought. So is the case for Ryan as his relationship with Alex grows closer
than its original casual roots, while his sisters impending wedding for which
he has to take pictures of the happy couple’s cut out next to tourist spots
only further sees him questioning if he is missing something.
A film truly carried by Clooney’s Cary Grant esc charms,
especially with his way with dialogue which is only emphasised by the narration
he provides and which frequently provides the best insight into his character,
especially when he is so often on the defensive to those around him. At the
same time he gets equally strong support from both Farmiga and Kendrick who
while both playing feisty ladies each bring their own approach to playing this
sort of character, especially with Farmiga who effortless manages to switch
between aggressiveness and femininity, making her the perfect match for Ryan
especially when their lifestyles mirror each other, as highlighted during their
initial meeting which soon descends into a game of perk card one upmanship.
Their relationship frequently providing a source of fascination as they work
around their situation, rerouting appointments to create connecting cities and
sending flirty texts when apart and while it might have started casual they
soon find things unintentionally getting closer.
Equally fascinating are the segments involving people being
fired which not only features a standout appearance by J.K. Simmons, while Reitman also works in interviews with real
people who responded to an advert he placed looking for people to appear in a
documentary about job loss in an attempt to avoid actors responding. Each of
these interviews also saw the participant being fired on camera, while being
asked to respond either how they responded originally or how they wished they
had responded to the situation. Of these interviews twenty two would be used in
the film, which certainly adds a level of realism to the situation, with some
of the responses being truly heart breaking, making you wonder how Ryan
actually manages to do this job.
A film which manages to walk the tightrope between humour
and real emotion perfectly, even if the journey by the end does have the feeling that we have spent going in a circle. Still the film is funny and smart enough to make the journey an enjoyable one, while finally providing a much needed companion piece to "Thank You For Smoking".
Title: The Darjeeling Limited Director: Wes Anderson Released: 2007 Starring: Adrien Brody, Owen Wilson, Jason Schwartzman, Anjelica Huston, Waris Ahluwalia, Bill Murray
Plot: Three brothers Peter (Brody), Francis (Wilson) and Jack (Schwartzman) who having drifted apart since the last time they were together at their fathers funeral. Now reunited by the oldest brother Francis, they travel across India aboard the luxury train “The Darjeeling Limited” so that they can reunite with their equally estranged mother (Anjelica Huston) who is currently running a convent in the foothills of the Himalayas.
Review: Despite originally being a film which I originally had my reserves about seeing initially, after the first time I saw it I found myself as the end credits rolled with an uncontrollable urge to watch it again. Needless to say it has been a returning feeling every time I have watched this film and even now sitting down to write this review it has me already wanting to dig it out again.
Now don't let the exotic locale distract you as this is still very much Anderson's world, with the three brothers being unquestionably classic Anderson creations let alone equally as eccentric as each other, with Francis having survived a recent near fatal motorcycle accident now sporting a new lease on life (aswell as looking like a badly wrapped mummy), which he is determined to force on his brothers wether they want to embrace it or not, as he plots out a detailed itinerary for their trip, while also stealing their passports to prevent them from abandoning the trip early. Peter meanwhile is trying to deal with the fact his wife is pregnant with their first child, while fearing that his marriage is heading for divorce and to distract himself spends most of his time antagonising his brothers with his claims of being their fathers favourite, while furthering their irritation by keeping many of their father’s possessions for himself. Jack meanwhile is a hopeless romantic obsessively listening to the messages on his ex-girlfriends answer machine, while writing short stories which contain striking similarities to people in his own life.
Anderson regulars Wilson and Schwartzman are once again on great form slipping perfectly into their individual roles, with Anderson once again showing that he is one of the few directors who can capture their quirky charm, rather than turning them into more odd-ballish creations. Brody meanwhile holds his own well with the strong chemistry between the three actors, being used to powerful effect, especially during the scenes shared solely between these three characters. Meanwhile fellow Anderson regular Bill Murray is reduced to a glorified cameo as an American Businessman who we see chasing after train in slow motion, only to be overtaken by Brody’s Peter in one of the numerous standout sequences to feature throughout the film. Still the inclusion of Murray in the cast really did ask the question as to why?
This film is a prime example of Anderson at his quirky best as the brothers make their way across India, dabbling in local medicines and engaging in unplanned misadventures, while generally arguing, occasionally brawling and even engaging in a spontaneous mace attack as they travel from place to place and occurring the wrath of the train steward (Ahluwalia) who holds little patience for anyone who’d attempt to disrupt the running of the train. What I really love about this film though is that even through the brother go through this journey together, by the end of the film they are none the closer than when they started, with their meeting with their mother being used instead to explain why these characters are like that they are. Equally a much criticised death of a young Indian boy, ensures that the audience is never truly sure of what direction the film is going in, especially with Anderson feeling no reason it would seem to take the most direct routes with his plotting.
Essentially made as a tribute to the films of Satyajit Ray, the film came largely out director Wes Andersons desire to make a film in India, having long held a fascination with the country, while at the same finding inspiration from the Indian documentaries by Louis Malle, as well as Jean Renoir’s “The River” and it’s a love which clearly carries across into the film in much the same way that Sofia Coppola’s (sister to co-writer Roman) love of Japan was evident in “Lost In Translation”. Here nearly every frame of the film is shot to truly capture the flavour of the country, from the panoramic beauty of the landscape to the bustle of the markets, Anderson makes sure that his love for India is truly captured on screen. However Anderson is not using this setting in a touristy way but more a backdrop for his story and seemingly takes every effort to avoid any of the usual clichés and stereotypes which typically dog any film set in such exotic climes and instead aims to surprise the audience, with scenes such as the first time we meet the stewardess Rita who speaks standard English and bares none of the usual cliché stereotypes of the dutiful female, especially when she engages in a spontaneous fling with Jack.
The soundtrack is once again classic Anderson as he combines the retro charms of “The Kinks” and “Peter Sarstedt” as well as using the less well known “Play With Fire” by “The Rolling Stones” to great effect, as he once again gives us a treasure trove of retro tracks, while flavouring with a selection of classical and Indian music tracks from the likes of Satyajit Ray and Ravi Shankar.
While perhaps a little too quirky for the uninitiated, especially with it’s ponderous (but never dull) plotting and especially with Anderson’s refusal to bide by any of the usual road trip movie rules, especially as nothing it ultimately learned by the journeys end and for those finding themselves in this group I would urge them to check out the equally great “Rushmore” for a more gentle introduction to Anderson’s world. However for the established fans, especially for those of you who loved “The Royal Tenenbaums” as he sets out to builds on similar themes which he explored with that film, such as abandonment, sibling relationships and more essentially the non working privileged class. This however is one vision of India your likely to forget anytime soon.
For more Wes Anderson related writing this month make sure you show some love to the nice folks over at "French Toast Sunday" aswell as for other fun film related writings.
Director: Ben Wheatly Released: 2012 Starring: Steve Oram, Alice Lowe, Eileen Davis, Richard Glover, Monica Dolan, Jonathan Aris, Richard Lumsden
Plot: A decidedly British black comedy, which finally fills the space for a Natural Born Killers meets Caravan holiday crossover (for anyone who’s been holding out for such a thing) as caravan enthusiast Chris (Oram) takes his shy and retiring girlfriend Tina (Alice Lowe) on what they hope will be a dream sightseeing holiday in his caravan, only to end up on an impromptus killing spree.
Review: For myself and my fellow brits here on this rain soaked isle, there are few things which seem so British as the idea of the caravanning holiday, were you forgo the comfort and luxury of a hotel room, to sit in the middle of a field while generally doing your business into a chemical toilet. This is of course after you have finished being the bane of every motorist you cut off or delay with the monstrosity you have chosen to tow behind your car. No doubt the people who enjoy these sorts of holidays being viewed as the least likely inspiration for a pair of serial killers, but here it is an idea which works surprisingly well, as the leather cladded “Natural Born Killers” Mickey and Mallory are exchanged for out knitware loving duo, which even extends in Tina’s case to a lovely pair of knitted crotch less panties (no sure how that would work out in real life, much less how well knitware lends itself to lingerie).
I would say to start that the best way to view this film is really to go in as blind as possible, which having said that it is far from the easiest thing I know in these times were information on any film is ever only a mouse click away. Equally problematic is the trailer, which while it does a great job of selling the film, perhaps gives away a little too much of the potential surprises the film could have delivered and something which frequently proved to be a real frustration when watching the film and knowing that so many moments could had been a lot more effective had I not know they were coming. Perhaps with this in mind you should just bookmark this review and come back when you have seen this film to avoid any potential spoilers I may leak throughout, while ensuring the maximum amount of surprise from this truly original film.
Both Chris and Tina are far from your text book serial killers with their love of knitwear and genuine desire to visit the frequently twee tourist attractions such Crich Tramway Museum and Keswick Pencil Museum, with their desire to kill usually being triggered by those who don’t fit into their world view or more frequently anyone who they believe has disrespected them, be it a litterbug or upper class snobs, one way or another the duo soon find a way to settle the score and in their mind restore the balance. Still when we first meet them, you would never think that either of these two would be capable of such random acts of violence. Tina in particular though is the most interesting, seeing how when we meet her she introduced as an awkward soul who is shown living a sheltered life, still living at home with her hypochondriac mother, a situation which has seemingly resulted in her withdrawing into herself, with her relationship with Chris being an attempt to break out of this rut, especially since her mother has never forgiven her for accidently killing the family dog in a bizarre knitting needle accident.
While initially it is Chris who does the killing, covering for his murderous tendencies by making his murders look like accidents, as he hides this side of his world from Tina only for her to soon become drawn into this side of things, as she finally explores her own murderous side which is frequently hinted at before she reveals it, though as the duo embrace this new world view based on Chris’s theories of each death helping to restore the balance, it is only a matter of time before things soon start to spiral out of control, which soon becomes one of the main focuses of the film as director Wheatly unflinchingly charts the deterioration of their relationship as you wonder how it will all end, while ensuring that this pitch black comedy is only painted in the darkest shades.
Due to their killing spree antics It is impossible to view this film without drawing comparisons to “Natural Born Killers” and perhaps to a lesser extent the controversial French thriller “Base-Moi”, both of which seem to have been a key influence in the creation of this film, but while Chris and Tina might be getting the same arousal from their killing, with each one usually followed by enthusiastic sex scenes, but the key difference here though is that they don’t have to kill to fill some unquenchable thirst for violence and death like their counterparts, but instead it truly is about restoring the balance for them. The deaths though are certainly as original as they frequently are brutal with bludgeoning’s and even the caravan itself being used as the means of despatch for their victims, with some great special effects on show even though Wheatly doesn’t take the film into slasher territory by giving it a high body count, he does however ensure that when someone dies they do in it is suitably memorable, especially as he teases out each kill by slowly cranking up the anticipation until the inevitable conclusion.
“Sightseers” is certainly an interesting film and Wheatly here really surprises us with this surprise change of style, especially after the pitch black thrillers “Down Terrace” and the cinematic marmite “Kill List” which truly proved to be the sort of film which divides audiences, which is no doubt what will happen with this film, even more so when Wheatly’s brand of black humour is so dark that it won’t be to everyone’s tastes while the humour being more incidental than the trailer would you have you believe it is no doubt making it far from the easiest watch for most movie goers, especially those without a slightly warped sense of humour, which is essentially who this film will most appeal to, making it certainly what you would call a niche film. Seeing how so much the of the film is based on British culture, I am especially curious to see how this film translates to audiences outside of the UK and whether it will manage the same appeal that Edger Wright’s (who appears here as executive producer) equally British culture influenced projects like ”Spaced”, “Hot Fuzz” and “Shawn of The Dead” have managed. For now it remains a darkly comedic curiosity, but one which you will likely only watch once as it holds little to reward repeat viewings.
This is part of the LBGT Blogathon hosted by YAM Magazine, while also a prelude to next week's Queer Film Blogathon hosted by Garbo Laughs.
Title: The Doom Generation
Director: Gregg Araki
Released: 1995
Staring: James Duval, Rose McGowan, Johnathon Schaech, Dustin
Nguyen, Margaret Cho, Perry Farrell, Parker Posey, Christopher Knight, Lauren
Tewes
Plot: Jordan White (Duval) and Amy Blue (McGowan) find
themselves on a road trip of sex and violence after a chance meeting with
fellow outsider Xavier Red.
Review: A classic example of Director Gregg Araki’s more
infamous style of filming, while also the second film in his “Teenage Apocalypse
Trilogy”, a trilogy created from the use of reoccurring themes and ideas rather than characters and plot lines. This film was also the first of Araki’s films I ever saw, when I
caught a late night showing back when I was still an angry youth starting
college, were its punk rock sensibilities appealed strongly, much less the fact
it was filled with gratuitous sex, which was still quite a rarity for films
back in the late 90’s rather than our current over sexed decade, were full frontal nudity and sex has nowhere near the surprise factor it had
back then. With this in mind I was eager to see if it still if the film still had the same appeal
now that it did back then, coming back to it with an older view point and perhaps less angry standpoint.
Opening at an underground metal club were the words “Welcome
To Hell” are written in fiery silhouette pretty much highlight the current state of
society, for if the third film of this trilogy “Nowhere” was the end of days,
this film is certainly the lead up to the pending apocalypse as society is
quickly descending into a lawless cesspit of depravity and commercialisation,
with the youth seemingly have long since become despondent and jaded about the
world around them. It’s a view point which Amy essentially embodies as she
scowls her way through this misadventure, colorfully cursing anyone who’d
stand up to her, while seemingly only caring about her boyfriend Jordan. Jordan on the
other hand is almost like the polar opposite to Amy and making him an even more
surprising boyfriend choice, especially with his permanent positive outlook
which seemingly steams from his naivety to the world around him. Jordan’s
naivety and general worldly outlook especially comes into question when the
couple rescue Xavier from a gang of punk goon (played by the band Skinny Puppy) a
charismatic drifter who tends to invoke spontaneous act of violence whenever he
is in any area for too long.
Violence of course being is one of the key themes of this
film alongside cultural symbolism and relentless eroticism, with the violence
in particular here being especially memorable let alone the trigger point of
the trio’s misadventure stemming from the accidental killing of a quick stop
clerk. Still it is a subject with Araki chooses to shoot in a variety of
different ways throughout the film from humorous (a bar patron accidentally
receiving a samurai sword to the crotch) to gratuitously graphic as seen by the
death of the clerk who not only has his head blasted clean off, but then
follows up by having said head continuing to incoherently burble away.
Meanwhile his other main obsession sex is shown in an unsurprisingly
graphic style and literately to the point were nearly every other scene seems
to involve Amy having sex with either Jordan or Xavier or both, as the film
climaxes (in more way than one) with a spontaneous threesome. This development
with the group dynamic never really sat right with me and even now still
doesn’t exactly make anymore sense, especially when Amy is shown openly hating
Xavier only to suddenly feel an uncontrollable urge to sleep with him, as soon
as the first chance appears. Equally frustrating is Jordan’s reaction to this situation
which he just happily accepts as if it’s a perfectly normal situation, rather
than raising any kind of complaint!?! What is most surprising here though is Araki’s fascination
with making a film that features purely heterosexual sex, something he seems
especially proud off seeing how he opens with the title card “A Hetrosexual
Movie By Gregg Araki”, while his other films had often approached the subject
of sex with an open mind to showing all persuasions on equal terms, making the
point of highlighting such a point only further confusing.
With Araki so focused on his cramming in as much sex and
violence as possible, it is unsurprising that the plot is as paper thin as it
is, with the sketchily drawn trio travelling down a seemingly endless series of
desert roads in a continuing cycle of sex and violence, with the only real plot
point outside of this being the reoccurring cases of mistaken identity which
Amy causes with various oddball characters claiming that she is their ex
partner and often providing the trigger point for further spontaneous violence,
while making comparisons to Oliver Stone’s “Natural Born Killers” almost
inevitable and while he might describe it as a black comedy or as some DVD
covers proclaim “A Road Murder Sex Comedy” it’s far from the most humorous of
films, with the humour content being strongly dependent on how funny you find
the acid tongued put downs by Amy, especially when her vocabulary is
interesting to say the least.
Shot with an almost intentional focus on making the film
look as trashy as possible; Araki has seemingly created a teen movie which
intentionally sets out to rebel against the cookie cutter teen movies of the
Hollywood mainstream, as counters the virginal teens of those movies with his
despondent trio here, who are more than happy to blitz their way through life in
a haze of pot and sex, with the art direction containing an excessive yet
controlled quality to it, while even the more normal sets still containing
subtle surreal elements such as the quick stop sign which proclaims
“Shoplifters Will be Executed” or the record store thought bubbles.
One of the more shallow Araki movies, it’s punk esq style of
storytelling and film making will no doubt still ring true with some, but I
can’t say that it is still a film which I look upon with the same awe that I
did back when I first saw it, even though it is still a bizarrely fascinating
movie for all of its flaws.
Title: The Horseman Director: Steven Kastrissios Released: 2008 Staring: Peter Marshall, Caroline Marohasy, Brad McMurray, Jack Henry, Evert McQueen, Christopher Sommers. Bryan Probets, Steve Tandy
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Plot: Christian is a divorced father grieving over the recent death of his daughter, only to be pushed over the edge when he receives a particularly nasty porn video through the post, featuring his recently deceased daughter, whose death it would seem is connected to this tape. Fuelled by rage, Christian sets out on a violent revenge fuelled roadtrip, to find the men behind the tape.
Review: From the outset this film might seem like so many of the other disposable by the numbers revenge thrillers of late, especially as it opens with Christian introducing one of the men, whom we can only assume is responsible for his daughters death, to the business end of a crowbar as Director Kastrissios films it all with an unflinching eye as the blows rain home while he goes about his crude and amateurish method of interrogation, yet what Kastrissios has created here is in fact a thoughtfully plotted and grimly brutal thriller, which despite the plot, coming from what is honestly being pretty well trodden ground, having been reworked numerous times since the godfather of relative retribution movies “Get Carter” (1971) perfected the blue print, spawning unintentionally a running theme between these films, who frequently have a link in some way to the porn industry, which continues right up to the equally noteworthy “Princess” (2006) in which a former missionary hunts down those responsible for his porn star sisters demise, yet despite this all being familiar territory Kastrissios still manages to bring something new to the game, through some stylish editing and original shocks as it manages to rise above just being another torture porn title, as he avoids just going for cheap shocks over substance.
Another point worth certainly noting with this film would be that unlike so many other titles in the genre, this particular road trip of revenge, on which Christian finds himself on is never shown as bringing him any form of joy or happiness, with the path of revenge being shown as being a lonely and isolated one, while it’s also clear that he isn’t getting any kind of pleasure out of having to resort to the primitive and brutal means he does, to find out the required information he needs, while at the same time clearly seeing no other way of finding closure to his daughters death, as he shows no quarms about resorting to such means while frequently being shown as being constantly emotionally numb, frequently carving his arms in a bid to feel anything atoll, as Kastrissios attempts to create with this film a study of how grief can affect us, rather than just focusing purely on blind hate and revenge, which is traditionally the more popular route for a film of this kind. Still its really only though through Alice (Marohasy), that he finds truly finds a purpose in life again, for although they might both be lost souls, he still in someway feels he can help her, becoming almost like a surrogate parent figure to her, while in turn Alice seems to help him to retain what few shreds of humanity he still maintains, as he only become increasingly drawn into a world were revenge is all that matters. This relationship could easily be compared to that of Travis and Iris in “Taxi Driver” (1976) and whom Travis faces numerous bad guys to rescue at the films climax, in the much the same way we see here, in one of the more less plausible moment, as Christian goes truly postal on the now disposable minions, who stand between him and Alice, who it by this point is portrayed as Christians sole hope of salvation, from this world of violence and bloodshed he has now created for himself.
Still if one thing is clear though after watching this film, it would be that Kastrissios is a director who loves a metaphor, seeing how he names our antihero the biblical name of “Christian”, while keeping his methods of dispatch clearly Old Testament, while reworking his day job of being in pest control, with the pests now the human scum who murdered his daughter, even the title portrays him as this apocalyptic figure his is coming after these men and bringing all kinds of hell with him, as he drives through the outback, with his white van replacing the white steed of death. True these might seem like Kastrissios is trying to hammer home the message regarding Christians quest for revenge, that he’s not necessarily a bad man, but rather a man trying to restore the balance in his life and while the almost continuous stream of killings, verges towards becoming tiresome, especially when he runs out of back story to fill in the gaps in Christians back story.
The violence if anything is certainly creative here, with the some noteworthy moments involving not only fish hooks being attached one guys testicles, but also finally answering the question of why it’s not advisable to stick a bicycle pump in your penis as another man can safely account for here in scenes equally comparable to the leg crossing moments of torture seen in "Hard Candy" (2005). It’s also worth nothing that although the majority of fights frequently verge on the side of ridiculous especially during the finale, were Christian proves pretty spritely for a middle aged man as he is frequently shown taking on much younger and seemingly fitter opponents and winning, though these fights are not beautifully choreographed brawls, but instead shot with a very raw and realistic edge, as they frequently break into floored grapples, usually followed by the introduction of a blunt object of some description, for which Christian is nothing if not creative, especially when it comes to turning his surrounding into potential weapons, even though the majority of his kills are devised from the everyday tools of his trade, as he manages to find a number of increasingly sadistic ways of utilising them. Still the majority of the violence, especially the more graphic moments are implyed rather than shown, which no doubt is for the best and keeps the film from becoming to grimey, while ensure that it's not just written off as yet another torture porn style movie.
I really want to like this film more, but it actually suffers from trying to overdo the revenge aspects of this film as strange as that might sound, this is especially true when you look at the body count as it seems that Christian is working his way through the production crew of an indie feature than a grimy porn film, with the amount of people on his revenge list and it's this almost conveyor belt like experience of revenge that detracts strongly from the film overall, even though there are some touching moments between Christian and Alice, by the time the big evil of the film has shown up, it already feels far too overblown which although unusual to say about revenge films in general, were the higher the body count, the better the film, this is certainly not the case here and it's this slip in focus from Kastrissios, which stops the film from being a great film, rather than merely a good film, especially when it's not really giving the audience anything that they havn't seen before, with perhaps the exception of revenge methods, were this film is certainly nothing short of original in that respect.
Basically this is my love letter to the cinema I adore, with the main focus being to look away from the mainstream and instead look more in the direction of Cult, Foreign and Obsure cinema and everything that comes in between. This blog is also about keeping movie going fun and embracing the randomness, that can often be found, while also uncovering the occastional hidden great, often in the most unlikely of places.
I try to add somthing new atleast once a week, but I'd rather keep this blog fun to write and so i'm not neglecting commitments outside of this blog.
Wanna Contact Me?
Got somthing you'd like to ask outside of the blog? Got stuff to send me?